
Table of Contents
|
COVER STORY
Another summer of killings
Militants have renewed their killings in the Kashmir Valley, taking advantage
of the reduction in security levels in view of the Kargil conflict.
PRAVEEN SWAMI
in Anantnag
SEVERAL months ago, some families migrated from Bilaspur in Madhya Pradesh
and Etawah in Uttar Pradesh to Sandu, 9 km from Anantnag, in search of work
in brick kilns. On June 29, when the workers were asleep after a hard day's
work, terrorists arrived at their huts a little after midnight. It took several
minutes before two men working through the night stoking the kilns, whom
the terrorists had forced to act as guides, could wake any of them up. Five
men workers came out of one set of huts, and seven from a second cluster
of huts some 200 metres up the road. Several others slept through the sharp
commands to come out. Fatigue ensured that they survived the massacre that
followed.
Women workers, who came out hearing the commotion, turned out to be the only
witnesses to the killings. They were ordered to stand to one side as the
terrorists began a desultory conversation. One of the three terrorists who
were at the cluster of huts nearer to the road asked to share a bidi, an
act that was intended to ensure coordinated fire with the second group of
terrorists. Then shots rang out. The leader of the smaller group fired from
his assault rifle on single-shot mode, picking his targets one by one. The
larger group fired automatic weapons, ripping apart the workers' bodies.
Then, having completed the first communal massacre in Jammu and Kashmir this
summer, they left the brick kilns as quietly as they came.
The carnage at Sandu and the massacre of nine villagers at Mendhar in Poonch
district two days later have proved that India's military successes in Kargil
are just a counter-point to an otherwise depressing summer in Jammu and Kashmir.
With the Kargil conflict having thinned out troops meant for counter-terrorist
operations, security forces in the Valley have found themselves short of
at least 25,000 personnel. The pressure on the troops has created space for
terrorist acts designed to deepen the fissures between the Hindu and Muslim
communities throughout the State and also the country. The offensive also
comes at a time when a spectrum of powerful figures have demanded a new partition
of Jammu and Kashmir, one that would forever tear the State asunder on communal
lines.
Several observers have attributed the new round of communal killings to the
June 28 murder of 17 Muslim residents of Mohra Bachchai hamlet near Surankote.
The victims, who included three women and three minor girls, were the relatives
of Khalil Khan, Imtiyaz Ahmad and Mushtaq Ahmad, three top Hizbul Mujahideen
activists belonging to the village. Many local residents promptly, but unfairly,
blamed the Army for these killings. On August 3 last year, 19 family members
of top Harkat-ul-Jihad Islami terrorist Imtiaz Sheikh were shot dead at Salian
village by unidentified gunmen. A State Human Rights Commission inquiry had
held the Army responsible for the murders. No individuals or units were indicted,
but the killings followed the murder of Zakir Hussain, a key source of the
9 Para Commando Regiment, a formidable Army unit based in northeastern India.
AIJAZ RAHI/ AP
A 10-year-old
lighting the pyre at the cremation of his father who was killed by militants
in Sandu village near Anantnag on June 29.
Investigations into the June 28 massacre have largely been built around the
testimony of its sole survivor, Zubaida Bi. From her hospital bed in Jammu,
Zubaida Bi confirmed reports of a bitter power struggle between the Sameer
Mohammad faction of the Hizbul Mujahideen, to which her relatives belonged,
and the Kauner Mehmood group. The power struggle exploded when a female relative
of key figures in the Kauner Mehmood faction was kidnapped by Sameer Mohammad's
unit on suspicion of being a police informer. The woman was raped, tortured
and then shot. Zubaida Bi believes that the massacre of her family members
was a reprisal action. Although she saw men in uniform near the village on
the eve of the killings, Zubaida Bi insists that many of the 13 persons who
carried out the attack were terrorists from the region, and not soldiers
in disguise. Her account is plausible for more than one reason. Had the Hizbul
Mujahideen believed the killings were carried out by the Army, its response
would most likely have been a communal massacre in the Poonch area itself.
Further, the Zakir Khan group, believed to be responsible for the Anantnag
massacres, has no history of involvement in communal enterprises. The
once-powerful Zakir faction of the Hizbul Mujahideen has been under intense
pressure from the Anantnag police and the Rashtriya Rifles and is unlikely
to have volunteered for an enterprise that was certain to invite targeting
by the security forces. The Zakir group's top bomb-maker, code-named Shaheen,
had been eliminated a week before the Sandu killings. Another member of the
group was shot dead in February at Dharna.
WHY then were the Anantnag killings carried out? Cynics believe that the
Zakir faction was just reminding brick kiln owners of their "obligation"
to pay protection money. They say that brick kilns have been a major source
of revenue for the terrorists in the area and the return of peace in Anantnag
curtailed this lucrative source. Whatever the truth, the killings have sparked
an exodus of migrant labour from the State, a crippling experience businessmen
are certain to avoid in the future.
Other interesting explanations have also been offered. Khundra, near Acchabal,
is home to one of the Army's largest field ordnance depots. The movement
of ammunition from the depots depends largely on a heavily secured road,
just one kilometre ahead of Sandu. The massacre may have been designed to
draw security pickets away from the road as a prelude to attacks on ammunition
convoys.
The killings at Mendhar appear to have had little connection with the Anantapur
massacre. Apparently, they have had their origins in an affair between Shankar
Lal, a local resident, and Arifa, the daughter of Sher Mohammad. The two
eloped in mid-May, following which Muslim communalists insisted that the
girl had been abducted. Their Hindu counterparts gave the issue a political
colour, claiming that the local police harassed Shankar Lal's family. Some
terrorists joined in the fracas and warned the local Hindu population that
failure to return Arifa would invite their wrath. Ironically, Shankar Lal's
father Mohan Lal and mother Kaushalya Devi escaped the terrorist attack.
Those who were killed included 95-year-old Jeevan Das, his 87-year-old wife
Ishro Devi and two children.
That the Surankote killings may not have been the trigger for the Mendhar
massacre is illustrated by the fact that terrorists have for several years
intervened in communal disputes. In August 1997, Manzoor Hussain, a Gujjar
schoolteacher posted at Sewari Buddal village in the Reasi area, married
Rita Kumari, a Hindu girl who came from an impoverished home. The two evidently
married with the blessings of Rita Kumari's mother. After the local police
refused to intervene, three dominant feudal Rajput families stepped in to
punish the couple for the temerity. Rita Kumari was abducted, while Hussain
and his mother-in-law were severely beaten. Hussain subsequently approached
the Farid Khan group of the Hizbul Mujahideen for revenge. Eight members
of the three families, who had organised Rita Kumari's abduction, were
slaughtered.
SHANKER CHAKRAVARTY
Ali Bhutto,
head of the terrorist cell in Turtok, who has been arrested.
Read in the context of last summer's massacres, the renewal of the killings
requires little interpretation. The broad objective, then as now, is to apply
a communal cleaver between the predominantly Muslim areas north of the Chenab
and the predominantly Hindu areas to its south. Pakistan's fundamental
post-Pokhran objective in Jammu and Kashmir, as its Kargil assault confirms,
is to force a conventional engagement that would raise the prospect of a
nuclear conflagration and then deploy these developments to force a
Western-mediated settlement. In such an event, widespread hostilities between
Hindus and Muslims within Jammu and Kashmir would serve an obvious purpose.
Local politicians seem determined to aid Pakistan in this objective. As with
past massacres, the Surankote and Mendhar killings saw communal mobilisation
by local units of the Bharatiya Janata Party, on the one hand, and the National
Conference in tacit alliance with the Jamaat-e-Islami, on the other.
KARGIL'S impact on security in the rest of the State might then be mildly
described as a calamity. Figures obtained by Frontline show that 58
battalions of the Army engaged in counter-insurgency operations have been
withdrawn for deployment on the border; 36 of these have been withdrawn from
Kashmir and 22 from the Jammu province. Just 14 Central Reserve Police Force
and six Border Security Force battalions have been moved in to take their
place. No one has any clear idea of just how the shortfall will be met,
particularly with the Lok Sabha elections round the corner. During the 1998
Lok Sabha elections, 354 additional companies, each consisting of 125 men,
were deployed throughout the State. Given that each battalion has between
four and six companies, at least 500 companies would have to be brought in
even to meet the 1998 security levels.
The reduction in security levels comes at a time when the demand for security
cover is certain to increase in the months to come. Last month's arrest of
a 25-member terrorist cell, led by Ali Bhutto, a local resident from the
Turtok area of Leh, has indicated that conflict can be expected in this quiet
region. Bhutto's arrest has been treated with little concern. But terrorist
activities had similar low-key origins elsewhere too. In Poonch, the first
sign of an offensive was the arrest of Ayyub Shabnam in May 1990. Shabnam,
who went on to spend five years in jail, was believed to be responsible for
the training of and distribution of weapons to several local operatives.
He, like Bhutto, had little knowledge of Pakistan's broader objectives. Few
took the incident seriously until Poonch went up in flames after 1993.
Even as Jammu and Kashmir finds itself lacking security cover, there is evidence
that cross-border infiltration has been unusually high this summer. Field
intelligence officials in Kupwara and Baramulla estimate that nearly 600
terrorists have moved in since March and occupied positions at heights above
4,000 metres. Anantnag too has witnessed a sharp rise in the arrival of Pakistani
and Afghan terrorists, with more than 200 of them reported to be active in
the district. While most terrorist groups have avoided frontal engagement
with the security forces, there is little doubt that since the Kargil war
broke out there has been a marked escalation in violence.
Since last summer, the mountain heights, which were considered areas of little
political significance, have seen large concentrations of Pakistani and Afghan
terrorists. Received military wisdom on this development was that these groups
lacked the motivation or resources to fight a losing battle in the Valley.
But a more intriguing possibility also existed. By building up numbers in
Doda, Banihal, Kupwara and the Rajouri-Poonch belt, terrorist groups could
dominate the heights over the four principal lines of access to the Valley.
In the context of increasing recovery in the recent months of heavy weapons,
ranging from mortar and anti-aircraft guns to a Grail anti-tank missile launcher,
some people argue that the current deployment patterns suggest that the terrorist
groups are preparing to support Pakistani troops in a conventional engagement.
SHANKER CHAKRAVARTY
Noor Bakshiya,
a terrorist from Turtok.
"We've made a terrible mistake by sundering the conflict in Kargil from that
in Jammu and Kashmir as a whole," a senior security official said. "After
all, very little has happened in Kargil that is fundamentally different in
character from what has been going on in Jammu and Kashmir over the last
10 years. Pakistan has pushed in arms and personnel and engineered sustained
violence against both the Indian state and its citizens."
In Sandu, there is little interest in the larger theatre for which the village
briefly became a stage. The Muslim residents reached out to the poor migrant
workers; they organised materials for the cremation of the dead and arranged
food, clothes and shelter for the survivors. When a labour contractor complained
that the death of the workers meant that the advance payments he had made
to their families would now have to be written off, he almost faced a lynching.
This display of sympathy illustrated the real ties between communities that
have survived 10 years of terrorism. But it is not clear if such a solidarity
can be sustained as some forces are arrayed against the people.
|